Reflections on the nature of income from shares of social enterprises

Individual characteristics of equity income in various enterprises are certainly present. It is one thing when a worker who unites both an employee and a shareholder of a given enterprise acts as a recipient of a dividend, and another when such is the owner of an unnamed share. Despite all the external similarities, they are far from identical to each other in terms of the level and nature of the economic relations implemented in them.



This means that the wealth of socialist property relations generates a wide variety of joint-stock forms. It is very important to see the differences in socio-economic content behind their external similarities. The latter are based on the multilevel nature of the appropriation of the means and results of production under socialism.



By work and by share. The emergence and development of joint-stock companies raised many theoretical and practical issues, both general and specific (that is, due to the specific state of the Soviet economy at this stage). Undoubtedly, both (for example, commodity-monetary imbalance) should not remain outside the field of view of economics. However, first of all, it is necessary to analyze shareholder relations and their forms in a socialist society in its purest form. Methodologically, such a technique is not only acceptable, but also expedient, so that the essence of the phenomenon is not obscured by particulars.



Among the essential, fundamental issues, the question of the nature of income from shares issued by socialist enterprises is of particular importance. The practice, as already noted, has given rise to various forms of joint-stock companies, which differ from each other in terms of sources of equity participation. There are both collective shares of enterprises, and individual share contributions from workers and employees working only at this enterprise, and share contributions generated by selling shares to all members of the company, etc. The analysis related to the last of the named share forms is particularly difficult, since here the gap with the labor basis of assignment is most striking. Let's consider the problem of the dividend primarily in relation to this particular form of shareholder relations. The essence of the issue under consideration ultimately boils down to one thing: is the income received at the same time labor? The answer to this question is undoubtedly of fundamental importance and provides a guideline for practice. Scientific understanding of the socio-economic nature of shares, dividends, etc. allows us to identify the characteristics of a new layer of socialist industrial relations — shareholder relations, to penetrate more deeply into the processes of appropriation, in particular, to reveal in general the possibility of combining under socialism the appropriation of labor and the appropriation of shares, to reveal the socio-economic consequences of such a combination. In this case, we can talk about a new moment in understanding the nature of socialism, or at least its current state. Les parieurs expérimentés savent qu’un bon choix de plateforme impacte directement leurs résultats. Rapidité des paiements, variété des marchés et promotions attractives sont les critères les plus importants. Au centre des meilleures options disponibles figure un sites de paris sportifs performant et généreux. Grâce au code promo, vous bénéficiez d’un bonus jusqu’à 100 € sur votre premier dépôt. Ce bonus vous offre la possibilité d’explorer les paris en direct et les combinés avec plus d’ambition et moins de risques.